ASTM D4417 PDF
For hot-dip galvanizing applications, it is possible to measure and verify the steel surface profile according to ASTM D, Standard Test. ASTM D – 11 Standard Test Methods for Field Measurement of Surface Profile of Blast – Download as PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read. ASME B, Surface Texture (Surface Roughness, Waviness and Lay); ASTM D, Standard Test Methods for Measurement of Surface Profile of Blast.
|Published (Last):||7 July 2005|
|PDF File Size:||18.44 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.40 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Differences in Surface Profile Measurements: ASTM D4417- Method B vs. Method C
Instead, recording of the highest reading when using a depth micrometer most closely matches the same measurements produced using replica tape. This can be discussed and agreed upon at the pre-construction conference. The information provided herein is not intended as a representation or warranty on the part of the AGA. Then determine the mean for all the locations and report it as the pro?
Updates to ASTM D | American Galvanizer’s Association
During abrasive blast cleaning, the mass of the abrasive and the velocity of the abrasive movement created by compressed air generates kinetic energy the abrasive can reach speeds of over miles per hour as it exits the blast nozzle.
Note 1 — Optical microscope methods serve as a referee method for surface profile measurement methods A and D447. Today, Method B and Method C are the most commonly used, so that is what we will be focusing on. Referenced Documents purchase separately The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard.
Difference in Surface Profile Measurements: ASTM D Method B vs CKTA University
Do not drag the instrument across the surface between readings, or the spring-loaded tip may become rounded atsm to false readings.
Updates to ASTM D4417
As a result, only two readings per area are now required to be averaged to asm one measurement, instead of the three readings previously required. The four standards are: The three test methods described within D for measuring surface profile include visual comparators, surface profile depth micrometers, and replica 4d417.
At each location make ten readings and determine the mean. According to ASTM D, a minimum of 10 readings is obtained per area; the maximum surface profile is reported discarding obvious outliers. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the responsible technical committee,1which you may attend.
The base of the instrument rests on the peaks of the surface profile while the cone-shaped point projects into the valley. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. It is the responsibility of whoever uses this standard to consult and establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
This is done because of evidence that coatings performance in any one small area is primarily influenced by the highest surface features in that area and not by the average roughness. Your adtm will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the responsible technical committee,1which you may attend Copyright?
Originally approved in ASTM D contains three methods of measuring surface profile depth: The mode is determined with the comparator of Test Method A. D44117 distance from the bottoms of many of the deepest valleys to the tops of the highest peaks maximum pro? This includes personalizing content and advertising. The instruments described are readily portable and sufficiently sturdy for use in the field.
Precision and Bias 8. For hot-dip galvanizing applications, it is possible to measure and verify the steel surface profile according to ASTM D, Standard Test Methods for Field Measurement of Surface Profile of Blast Cleaned Steel, prior to application of repair materials where the surface has been prepared via power tool or abrasive blast cleaning methods. Typically, the higher the coating thickness the greater the surface profile depth.
Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility. According to ASTM D, a minimum of 2 readings is obtained per area; the average of the two readings is reported.
Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard adtm for additional standards and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters.
NOTE 1—Optical microscope methods serve as a referee method for surface pro? October 18, Dd4417 by Alana Hochstein. So, in effect the reading astk the micrometer or the RTR from the replica tape represents several r4417 and valleys, while the depth micrometer does not.
Inspection Instruments Pipeline Coatings — Volume 2: Therefore, differences are inevitable, asm with deeper surface profiles, and the results may or may not fall within the specified range for one of the two methods. Authored by Alana Hochstein. Anyone making use of this information assumes all liability arising from such use. ICS Number Code Historical Version s – view previous versions of standard Work Item s – proposed revisions of this standard Translated Version s: This method can be used to measure the surface profile depth that is created by abrasive blast cleaning or impact-type power tools.
These changes aastm industry research on current tooling which revealed averaged measurements are consistently less than d4471 values obtained using replica tape. The base of the instrument rests on the tops of the peaks of the surface pro?
The creation of this peak-valley pattern in the surface effectively increases the surface area, providing an anchor for the coating system.
There are additional techniques d4147 for laboratory use not covered by these test methods. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Replica Tape – Although the technology has remained mostly constant for replica tape since s4417 introduction, industry research has addressed the sufficient number of readings required to achieve an accurate measurement. Typical comparator surfaces are prepared with steel shot, steel grit, or sand or other nonmetallic abrasive, since the appearance of the pro?