Evaluates the functional ability of paretic arm and hand to perform tasks. The Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI) is used to assess functional ability of the paretic arm and hand.[1]. Top Stroke Rehabil. Jul-Aug;18(4) doi: /tsr Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory-9 (CAHAI-9): perceived clinical utility.

Author: Gardajinn Arashirn
Country: Saint Lucia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Music
Published (Last): 21 May 2012
Pages: 277
PDF File Size: 3.71 Mb
ePub File Size: 9.34 Mb
ISBN: 679-6-54124-949-9
Downloads: 58175
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Feshicage

The cross-sectional validity comparison of the 2 CAHAI versions applied a convergent construct validation design. Original Editors – Laura Ritchie. Ms Lambert and Mr Griffiths provided subjects and data collection. Previous investigations 78 actiivty supported the psychometric properties of the CAHAI, and the following measurement properties have been reported: If one accepts a difference in curve areas of 0.

Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI)

The final measure consists of 13 items—hereafter referred to as the CAHAI—and takes approximately 25 minutes to administer and score. Thank you for submitting a comment on this article.

The difference in point estimates of the 2 CAHAI versions was less than the declared a priori clinical difference of 0. Toggle navigation p Physiopedia. This uncertainty is a consequence of our underestimating the required chrdoke size.

Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory – Physiopedia

This dissatisfaction has led to the development and application of numerous outcome measures. Given that the ARAT is an established measure, amd showing equivalence between the measures with no additional benefit of the CAHAI would add to the plethora of measures with no added value to clinicians or researchers.

International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification. Receive exclusive offers and updates from Oxford Academic.


Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory

Physiopedia articles are best used to find the original sources of information see the references list at the bottom of the article. With the thought of increased efficiency in mind, a previous study 8 investigated the feasibility of reducing the number of CAHAI items and ultimately its administration time.

Related articles in Google Scholar. All clients with stroke felt that the assessment provided reassurance regarding their recovery. The correlation between the scores of the 2 versions of the CAHAI at both the initial and follow-up visits was. Receiver operating characteristic curves, Pearson product moment coefficient of correlation, and regression analyses were used.

Good results as an upper limb ability assessment for clients within 14 days of stroke. All therapists agreed CAHAI-9 was suited for the stroke population and assisted identification of client abilities or difficulties within functional contexts.

One hundred five people with upper-limb dysfunction following a stroke were stratified into 2 impairment groups mild to moderate and severewhich were expected to change by different amounts. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant or his or her substitute decision maker.

The current investigation focused on the first 2 criteria. With so many upper-limb measures available, it is natural to question the development of another measure. The aim of this study was to explore both therapists’ and clients’ views on the clinical utility of CAHAI-9 within 14 days of stroke. We recognized that the increased efficiency associated with the shorter measure would come at a cost to its validity, and we examined whether the cost in terms of validity would be too great and activitj the proposed shorter dhedoke ineffective.

Five clients within 14 days of stroke were recruited by consecutive sampling from 1 metropolitan hospital and participated in structured individual interviews.


An Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. That is usually the journal article where the information was first stated. Contemporary Management of Motor Control Problems: From its conception, the CAHAI was designed specifically to assess upper-limb function in people cheedoke stroke, whereas the ARAT was derived from a measure, designed into assess upper-limb dysfunction in the general neurological population. I agree to the terms and conditions. Careful consideration of the theoretical constructs underpinning the CAHAI has resulted in a tool that is consistent with the current frameworks of motor learning and performance.

The principal goal is to assess upper-limb functional recovery, hznd a secondary goal may be to predict CAHAI scores. Existing measures have been criticized for focusing on impairments or consisting of contrived tasks that do not reflect real-life activities. Motor control and motor ingentory When refering to evidence in academic writing, you should always try to reference the primary original source. However, ascertaining the validity of data for a measure and the relative validity of data for competing measures is an ongoing process.

Total scores are obtained by summing the item scores. Please check for further notifications by email. A curve area of 0.

The content on or accessible through Physiopedia is for informational purposes only. Management of the Post Stroke Arm and Hand: